Sunday, June 13, 2010

New York Times article about Marriage Based Green Card Interviews

Courtesy of Nina Bernstein and the New York Times:

THE retired mechanic from Michigan looked shell-shocked beside his bride, a classical pianist from Moscow who clutched the printed e-mail exchanges of their Internet romance. Young newlyweds from Long Island, still recovering from their reception for 600 guests the previous weekend, faltered as their lawyer quizzed them on the details of their City Hall ceremony four months before. A Manhattan woman bickered with her Turkish spouse about the kinds of questions they had been warned to expect.

Did they know the color of each other’s toothbrush? The pattern of the bathroom tile? What had they done last New Year’s? And were they ready to answer far more intimate queries from a government official hunting for signs their marriage was fake?

“Embarrassing questions,” explained the Manhattanite, Lindsay Garvy-Yeguf, 28, the butterfly tattoo on her foot growing jittery, as her husband, Gunes Yeguf, 31, turned paler in his dark suit. “They might ask you about your sex life.”


Read the entire article here.

DOL Labor Certification (PERM) Application Processing Times as of 5/31/2010

Link.

OFLC has initiated an intensive effort to reduce the Permanent Labor Certification Program's pending caseload. Our goal for FY 2010 is to reduce the backlog by 50%. We are on schedule, and we will continue this effort as part of our larger Departmental commitment to customer service. The dates posted on iCERT above reflect the month and year in which cases were filed that are now being adjudicated at the Atlanta National Processing Center. For various reasons, we may be completing the processing of applications filed prior to the month posted on iCERT. If your application was filed more than 3 months prior to the month posted, you may contact our Helpdesk for a status on the application at plc.atlanta@dol.gov.

Friday, April 30, 2010

Online Chat with Maricopa County Sheriff Joseph Arpaio

Via the Washington Post:

Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County in Arizona was online Friday, April 30, at 12:30 p.m. ET to discuss the new immigration law signed last week by Gov. Jan Brewer (R), which criminalizes illegal immigration by defining it as trespassing and allows local law enforcement agencies to question people they suspect of being undocumented.

Washington, D.C.: How can law enforcement "reasonably suspect" someone of being undocumented without racial profiling? Other than race, what are the key indicators?

Sheriff Joe Arpaio: When you have a legitimate contact druing law enforcement operations, you should be able to ask for identification which law enforcement does anyway on a daily basis. You ask for ID and you see if that person is here illegally by checking out the immigration status of the person. We don't go around picking people off the streets because they look like they're from another country just because of their race.


Read the entire chat here.

Commentary from AILA Advocacy Director re: New Arizona Immigration Law

From AILA (American Immigration Lawyers Association) Advocacy Director, Greg Chen:

It's four days later and our nation is still reeling from Arizona's enactment of a harsh state law that will criminalize undocumented status in the state and effectively sanction the police to stop anyone who looks like an immigrant. The President and senior members of his administration have criticized the law as unfair, unrealistic, and possibly unconstitutional. On Friday, President Obama criticized the new law. Today while testifying before the Senate Judiciary Committee, DHS Secretary Napolitano announced that the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice are both reviewing the law and whether states and municipalities have the "inherent authority" to enforce federal criminal and civil immigration laws as Arizona has done. At a separate press conference on an unrelated topic, Attorney General Eric Holder confirmed this and expressed concern that the law could be subject to abuse and create a wedge between "communities that law enforcement is supposed to serve and those of us in law enforcement," He also said that a number of options are under consideration including the possibility of a court challenge. These are good initial signals, and the Administration should issue a clear statement that states should leave immigration enforcement to the federal government.

The silver lining to the Arizona law-if there is one-is that it has shaken immigrants and other Americans as well as our nation's leaders into confronting the need for immigration reform. In large numbers in Arizona and nationwide, people have turned out protesting the law. AILA has done our part by boycotting the state and moving our Fall Conference out of Arizona - a decision that has generated significant media attention. In criticizing SB1070, the President called again for Congress to "forge a bipartisan consensus" on comprehensive immigration reform.

The keyword is bi-partisan. Real immigration reform will only gain passage with support from both Republicans and Democrats. Senator Schumer knows this and has been explicit in his desire not only to work with Senator Lindsey Graham but other Republicans on a proposal. The President last week personally called several Republicans including newly elected Senator Scott Brown to seek their support. But that effort suffered a setback this weekend when Graham announced that he would not support immigration reform unless climate legislation moved first. He issued more definitive statements today that immigration reform would not happen this year.

Graham has been under intense pressure from his own party not to partner with Democrats on any major reforms. He has previously stepped back from immigration reform only to later come back to the table. So, when it comes to politics: never say never. In the meantime, Schumer along with Senators Reid and Durbin and House Speaker Pelosi have continued to prioritize immigration reform. Last week Reid and Pelosi said publicly they will move immigration reform this year. The National Journal suggested that Senator Schumer may move forward without Graham.

Democrats should push forward. Otherwise immigration reform will stop dead. But they should continue to reach out in whatever way possible to gain support from moderate Republicans. This is the kind of leadership that is needed.

Both parties face risks especially with elections looming. The greater risk is inaction by either party on an important issue like immigration that is rapidly gaining attention with states like Arizona taking action on their own. The effort to roll the great boulder of immigration reform up the hill remains tough work but at least it's moving. As steep as it may seem, Congress can only climb the mountain by sharing a rope with those across the aisle.

Stay tuned. Same Pulse Time. Same Pulse Channel.